saturn sl2 modders

Discussion in 'Saturn S-series' started by Rob Deen, Jul 25, 2004.

  1. Rob Deen

    Rob Deen Guest

    I am installing a pacesetter header kit
    on a '99 sl2 and want to flange in a
    straight thru resonator inplace of the
    cat. Does anyone have any ideas for a
    simulation O2 sensor device that emulates
    the output readings from the cat exit.
    I simply need to fool the ECU to not throw
    a SES code with this setup. If i have a
    schematic... i can build it.

    other related engine mods...
    _large bore Throttle Body
    _intake tube & cone filter.

    no oil burn @135k.

    Rob
     
    Rob Deen, Jul 25, 2004
    #1
  2. Rob Deen

    Blah Blah Guest

    Hmmm yes, break the law, choke the enviroment, gain 1hp.

    What is this your daily driver?
    May I ask what is the point in doing any of this?
    I doubt your engine moves enough air for that cat to be restrictive and
    any gains would be negligible.

    I always thought 4 cylinders were for fuel economy, not to sound
    pretty...

    My 2 cents, mean as it may sound. :-|
     
    Blah Blah, Jul 25, 2004
    #2
  3. Rob Deen

    uknewwho Guest

    and not to mention buning your exhaust valve springs from lack of back
    pressure,also, it will probibly sound like dirt. Leave the cat in.
    'Blah Blah' is right, the 1.9L (or any 4cly.) don't move enough air to get a
    gain, by removing the cat. It may even slow you down.
     
    uknewwho, Jul 25, 2004
    #3
  4. Rob Deen

    marx404 Guest

    While Blah may be making a valid point in his own way, you might also check
    out SaturnSpot.com, SaturnFans.com and XtremeSaturn.com, all great places to
    find other extreme modders. Why not just use a catback system or a dual
    bypass system insyead of bypassing the cat anyways? You wont waste much HP
    going that route and if it is a daily driver a cat is a good idea anyways.
    On the other hand, if your SL is only for track use (ie: Moroso) and not to
    be used on the street, then no cat is understandable.

    marx404
     
    marx404, Jul 26, 2004
    #4
  5. Rob Deen

    Ritz Guest

    Even in the best of circumstances, the 1.9L Saturn engine isn't a very
    tunable engine. It's an economy car, not a sports car. Installing a
    test pipe probably won't get you any benefit at all, other than causing
    the computer to completely botch your fuel trim. On one extreme, that
    will hose your gas mileage. On the other extreme, you'll run lean and
    roach your engine. Is that what you want?

    If you want a car to mod and fiddle with, get a tuner friendly car.
    There just isn't much available for the 1.9, and even the stuff that IS
    available isn't going to buy you much horsepower (but will definitely
    drain your wallet).
     
    Ritz, Jul 26, 2004
    #5
  6. Rob Deen

    marx404 Guest

    really now? While I said that I do agree that removing the cat for a
    streetable car isnt a good idea, hmm, perhaps we should quickly rush over to
    the aforementioned boards and warn all the 1.9 owners who have been doing
    this for years that they are not tunable and that there isn't much available
    for them ?

    See ya at Moroso. Cheers!

    marx404
     
    marx404, Jul 26, 2004
    #6
  7. Rob Deen

    Rob Deen Guest

    Yes i could have been more specific on the app
    for this mod. Flanging both the cat and the
    resonator would make for a quick out/in swap
    for street/track environments. Without a code
    during performance runs may add minimal warning
    of other system malfuctions especially during
    these open-loop conditions.
    thx to all respective replys.

    Rob
     
    Rob Deen, Jul 26, 2004
    #7
  8. Rob Deen

    Lane Guest

    a straight thru resonator inplace of the cat. Does anyone have any ideas for
    a simulation O2 sensor device that emulates the output readings from the cat
    exit.

    Unless the SES puts the car in limp mode, just drive with it on. If you're
    flanging the cat for a quick swap at the track, it shouldn't be a big thing.
    If you're considering running without a cat on a street car, please don't.
    The minimal gain isn't worth dirtying the air.

    I have no cat on my race car (track only) also - but don't think it's going
    to gain you more than a horse or two. Saturn catalytic converters are not a
    substantial bottleneck and aren't very restrictive.

    Casper Electronics sells a rear o2 simulator if you don't want the SES
    light. http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/oxygen_sensor_simulator/

    Why not do both if you can. Most of us do whatever we can to enjoy the cars
    we own.

    Unless you can refer me to occurrences where you've witnessed or read about
    this, I'd consider this one of the many old-school V8 tales that doesn't
    really apply to today's 4 cylinder motors. I know a handful of people who
    race Saturns in some form or fashion, and those who have been running for
    years with an open header and no exhaust haven't experienced any
    valve-related problems. Every nut and bolt has probably worked its way
    loose from the racket and vibration though.

    tunable engine.

    Sure it is. It may not be as easy to get a lot of horsepower out of it as
    others, but it has potential. There are people with turbo'd or nitrous fed
    S-Series motors with virtually stock internals running 250 to 300
    horsepower. Many of them hang out at http://www.turbosaturns.net/ .
    Many feel that it's what you do with the car that makes it a sports car, not
    the kind of car it is.
    than causing the computer to completely botch your fuel trim.

    The factory PCM has no problem adjusting fuel/air to most intake/exhaust
    changes.
    Whether people feel it is 'tuner friendly' or not, people continue to do
    some pretty neat things with Saturn cars:

    * Lisa Kubo has broken into the 7s in the quarter mile with her
    Ecotec-powered Ion (still 4 cyl, still FWD).
    http://www.saturnmotorsports.com
    * A Saturn Ion demolishes the previous top speed record in the G/BALT class
    on the Bonneville Salt Flats by setting an average 212 mph speed run. The
    previous record held by a Honda Civic was 183 mph. For pictures and more,
    check out the forums at http://www.saturnfans.com or
    http://www.theautochannel.com/F/news/2003/10/18/170946.html.

    * A Saturn SC2 takes top honors in the SCCA's Showroom Stock C class. Mike
    Kramer and the Thundersport Racing team dominated last year's Runoffs and
    managed to score a first ever National title for a Saturn in Showroom Stock
    C. While Saturn was viewed by some as not being competitive for the class,
    Mike's victory certainly showcased the true potential of the platform.
    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&groupid=19867&ck=

    * Jamin Cummings and Dale Seeley win the compact class in
    http://www.onelapofamerica.com/ in a '97 SC2. Take a car with almost
    200,000 miles on it, drive it 3000 miles across the country in one week's
    time, and stop along the way to compete at a dozen or so racetracks. And
    all the while - spraying an ENORMOUS amount of nitrous oxide. The race is
    a test of longevity, durability, and sleep deprivation - and Jamin & Dale
    drove the SC2 to victory. This is the third year in a row that a Saturn has
    taken first place in this very competitive class. Visit Jamin's website at
    http://www.spinorwinracing.com/ and read about their One Lap experience.

    * Team SCR scores 9 podium finishes. In an impressive season, the combined
    efforts of James Walker, John Comeskey and Mark Rushbrook managed to rack up
    quite an array of fine finishes for the 2003 season. They overcame chasis
    setbacks, uninvited on-track contact, and a few mechanical gremlins to put
    together one heck of a racing season! Check out Team scR's fall newsletter
    for details on their 2003 season at http://www.teamscr.com/03nl3.htm.

    * The Saturn Performance Club's very own Saturn SC2 takes top honors in the
    SCCA's CENDIV Improved Touring A class. After top-to-bottom preparation
    solely by SPC volunteers, we managed to score a victory in our maiden race.
    Immediately backing that up with 3 more victories and two second place
    finishes allowed us to finish at the top of the CENDIV points race for the
    2003 season. Another first for a Saturn in the CENDIV ITA world. Check out
    the racing section at http://www.saturnperformanceclub.com for details.

    Lane [ l a n e @ p a i r . c o m ]
     
    Lane, Jul 26, 2004
    #8
  9. Rob Deen

    Blah Blah Guest

    Ok so you plan on keeping it legal for the street? Thats good, I dont
    mind saying what it takes to fool the computer then so long as its kept
    "legal". The O2 sensor is basically a mild battery. Its voltage goes
    from .1v to .9v depending on if its rich or lean exhaust passing over
    it. Since the sensor your wanting to fool is downstreem of the Cat it
    should give a consistent reading to show that the converter is cleaning
    the burnt gases. So therefor the downstreem O2 sensor should give a
    constant .5v when everythings good and warm.
    So what do you need to do? You need a device that you can plug in when
    racing that supplies a constant .5 volts.
     
    Blah Blah, Jul 26, 2004
    #9
  10. Rob Deen

    Ritz Guest

    I've owned *three* Saturns and have 25 years experience as a mechanic.
    The 1.9 isn't very tunable. You can get a few hp here and a few hp
    there, but that's the long and the short of it unless you want to tear
    into the engine and do cams/valves/pistons/porting/etc. And even then,
    the engine isn't going to respond to those changes as much as a number
    of more "tuner friendly" engines. Been there, done that. It wasn't
    worth the $$$ for the very small amount of horsepower gained.

    I remember begging a number of manufacturers to produce supercharger
    applications for the 1.9L, but nobody was interested. These days, I
    drive a turbocharged Audi so I haven't spent a whole lot of time
    researching the 1.9L Saturn performance market, but a quick look at SPS
    and a few other sites didn't seem to indicate that things have changed
    much in the last few years (at least for the Saturn 1.9L).

    Cheers,
     
    Ritz, Jul 26, 2004
    #10
  11. Rob Deen

    Blah Blah Guest

    Well for one 4 cylinders can never sound pretty as they can never lope.
    They always sound like chainsaws. I think the best sounding 4 cylinders
    are the ones you cant hear. Same goes for modern trucks with v8's with
    stock cams. People pull the mufflers out or put in flowmaster mufflers
    and all you get is a droning noise when going down the highway. The
    wrong kind of sounds are very irritating. If they arent to you then your
    probably the kind of person with bad music taste and the kind of person
    that likes those repetitive lyrics songs that go on forever. lol :p

    Come to think of it I guess thats why people with fart pipes always seem
    to listen to rap.
    Everything and anything has potential when you put Turbo's or Nitrous
    to it. 250 and 300 horse isnt nothing when you can buy a stock late
    model f-body making 325hp for what it would cost getting a 4 cylinder
    car anywhere near that level. Even the torque and longevity of the v8
    would always be greater.
    In that case my SSE bonneville that I had was a sports car. Compaired to
    a british sports car from the 60's it could out corner and out
    accelerate the best of them.
    I think I would pick up a cheaper hobbie myself unless I was getting
    paid to do this kind of stuff...
     
    Blah Blah, Jul 26, 2004
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.