Philip Nasadowski said:
Hybrids aren't big sellers, nd even the optimists are now saying they
won't get much more than 10% of the total market...
??
Explain then why Toyota cannot produce those hybrids fast enough. Sure
didn't stop their Lexus hybrid nor Toyota's reluctance to build a new plant
for their Camry 2006 hybrid or the Outback hybrid SUV.
In real life, hybrids just don't get that much better mileage.
??
So the guy in the Toyota Prius forum who is getting 111 mpg is wasting gas?
Surely you jest. Even with it getting a wasteful 49-50 mpg (which seems
average) it still beats any other thing out there.
I bet Toyota could have just taken the Prius's laughable 70hp motor, put
it in
an Echo, gotten nearly the same EPA numbers. But it wouldn't have sold
because it'd be seen as what the Prius really is - a shitty gutless
Toyota.
Try driving one if you think it's gutless. I have driven it and it
accelerates like hell with the electrics. Local dealer sends his
salespeople to LA over a mountain called the Grapevine from Central Valley
and got it up to 104 mph with 4 people in it.
*ding!* They don't make economic sense. If you drive high miles,
you're mostly highway - Hybrids suck there. If you don't, the costs
NEVER outweigh the savings, especially in normally hot or cold climates
where the engine runs all the time.
What a load. If you look at the mileage numbers of some of the used 2001
models, they have over 100,000 miles on them. What loss? If you tend to
toss a vehicle every 2-3 years maybe, but if you hold onto it for 5-7 you'll
come out ahead. Besides, what stops a person from buying a pickup, say a
Dodge Ram Hemi verses a cheaper Nissan Titan (a $10,000 difference) when the
Titan gets better mileage? You could say you're wasting money on the Dodge
couldn't you? Paying a lease, for what amounts as a rental, could be seen
as wasteful too. To be fair, you need to compare it to an equivalent model
like a non-hybrid Prius. Remember the base price is around $21,000 or
similar to the Camry, but loading it up with all the electronic goodies
(GPS, etc) runs it, and any other model, up really quick to around $28,000.
Besides, the fuel savings "alone" on the hybrid is worth something to
future generations, regardless of cost. If the price of gas rises, then
you'' come out ahead if you hold onto the vehicle until 100,000 miles or
more. A three-fold mpg efficiency and the eco-savings negates the price of
any non-hybrid. Not to mention those with a $2-3K Gas-Guzzler Tax" imposed
(usually applied to the higher priced exotics over $70,000).
B~
It's the same reason why those
$1000 front load eco washers aren't worth it - you'll never save that
much water/electricity over the 4 year lifespan of them (a better idea -
make appliances that last 20 years, you'll save more energy)
Yes. It was a software problem and has been corrected.
In time, the hybrid's price will fall. Same hold true for just about
anything. Try and buy a mechanical watch cheaper than an electronic.
GM's biggest issue now is interior fit/finish, and lack of a nice RWD
sedan platform or two. And B-O-R-I-N-G styling....
I agree on that one. Always loved Ford's styling, just their lousy engines
and powertrains I had problems with.
B~