1) Noise - The ecotec engine is much more refined than the SL2 dohc engine.
Less noisy, more power. Rather nice. The gas mileage of the ION is slightly
(about 10%) worse than the SL2s in my estimation.
2) Handling - I like the way that the ION handles. However, I'm not a
spirited driver.
3) Acceleration - The ION feels quicker. I REALLY like the CVT on the
coupe - you stomp on the gas and the engine goes to full power and stays
there.
4) Spooky center panel. - I admit that I was a bit wary about it. However, I
actually like it. There is NEVER a problem with the steering wheel getting
in the way of seeing the display. And, I'm 43 years old and a bit
far-sighted. The instrument panel being about 9 inches farther away makes a
noticeable difference in the time and effort needed to focus on the speedo
and back onto the road.
If you have any more questions, let me know. - k.
Thanks. How? Noise? Handling? Acceleration? That spooky center
instrument panel?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Kohnen [mailto:bite_me_spammers@who_knows.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Chris Leithiser
Subject: Re: Ion vs. SL/SC
My wife and I each had a 97 SL2. I had a manual, and she had an
automatic.
We bought two ION 3s. I got the quad coupe, she got the sedan.
The ION is a vast improvement over the SL2.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Leithiser" <
[email protected]>
Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.saturn
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:08 AM
Subject: Ion vs. SL/SC
Anybody got thoughts on the merits of the Ion as regards the S series
it replaced? I'm getting rid of my 95 SL2 after 180,000 miles but not