E85 for 94 Saturn

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by wavy, Aug 1, 2006.

  1. wavy

    wavy Guest

    What would it take to get a 94 or 95 SC2 to run on E85?
    Change in Fuel Delivery? Modified PCM?
    E85 is now available in my area and its CHEAPER (not cheaper ENOUGH,
    though)!
    -WaVy
     
    wavy, Aug 1, 2006
    #1
  2. Here you go - http://www.e85fuel.com/index.php

    Go to the web site and click on E85 101 on the left side of the
    page. Then click on FAQ to get all your answers :)

    ~~Phil~~
     
    Phil Marshall, Aug 1, 2006
    #2

  3. When I asked about usind e85, and wondering the requirements, I was
    told I had to have my car's fuel system fully stainless steel.

    Considering my amount of underside rust I have, I didn't even want to
    look. I'm just guessing what type of materials must have been used in
    my 97SL2.

    later,

    tom @ www.WorkAtHomePlans.com
     
    Tom The Great, Aug 1, 2006
    #3
  4. wavy

    SnoMan Guest


    ALso E85 has less energy so it does not have the silver lining you are
    looking for and you will need to replace all of your metal fuel lines
    with Stainless Steel ones because of high water content of it by
    chemical nature. .
     
    SnoMan, Aug 1, 2006
    #4
  5. wavy

    wavy Guest

    Didnt find anything very hopeful on the "emmision test" qualifier.
    Seems that our wonderful government makes it illegal to install
    aftermarket conversion on non E85 vehicles. On the other hand...
    (who's business is it what I do under the hood as long as I can still
    pass emission tests!!!) I mean - will the EPA police be parked
    somewhere near the E85 pumps, watching for ethanol anarchists?!

    The only possibly definate I found so far is a kit from
    http://flextek.com/shop.htm
    I think its built in Brazil. Dont know for sure if it is plug/polarity
    compatible. It has a remote alcohol/gasoline switch. Polarity
    inversion kit is $90. Four cylinder wiring/computer kit is $516
    (WHEW!)
    I have no idea if the plastic Saturn fuel tank, fuel pump, or fuel
    lines are E85 Ok.
    (Anyone?)

    I assume that the "brain" in the FlexTec unit works with the original
    PCM in a way that emulates the volumetric equivalent of gasoline, but
    controls the operation of the fuel injectors autonomously. (I guess
    that should work!)

    Unless the cost advantage of E85 becomes more significant though, I
    dont think the cost of converting would be economically feasable.
    -WaV
     
    wavy, Aug 1, 2006
    #5
  6. wavy

    Bret Ludwig Guest

    SnoMan wrote:

    As an individual doing a DIY swap federal EPA regulations are of
    minimal concern. The Federales have never prosecuted a DIYer for
    violations yet. Passing your State regulations if your state has
    inspections is a concern.

    E85 does not present a problem to metal fuel components but it might
    to various rubber parts. Most rubber parts in cars today are largely
    ethanol proof, but you might consider upgrading any flex hoses and
    fitting a good prefilter to the initial fuel point (somewhere before
    the fuel rail).

    The bottom line is that on straight E85 you are going to have to flow
    roughly 40 percent more fuel, and the fuel/air ratio curves are going
    to be different. If you can fit an E85 sensor compatible ECM and the
    sensor and retain a factory harness, and somewhat larger injectors and
    come up with an appropriate map, you are okay. Otherwise you are going
    to have to use an aftermarket ECM and probably again different
    injectors. One conversion for VWs kept the Digifant EFI and added a GM
    TBI unit that ran either gas or ethanol simply by enabling or disabling
    the TBI injectors.

    If you are going to run straight E85 all the time, a quick fix might
    be to get the engine running open loop and put in injectors that will
    flow 40% more than the stock ones. Many domestic and foreign ECMs have
    "secret" open loop modes for vehicles sold in leaded fuel markets which
    can't use a cat or O2 sensor.

    Converting to an aftermarket mechanical FI or, Ghod forbid, a carb
    makes the whole thing simple: just jet appropriately.

    Problems include: if you move to a inspection/IM state, sell the
    vehicle, or they quit selling E85 you need to convert back. And
    economics: E85 is no cheaper by heat value!

    Easiest cheapest way to run E85 is buy a old simple motorcycle or VW
    Bug with a single carb you can rejet, replace all the rubber, slosh the
    tank and be good to go.
     
    Bret Ludwig, Aug 2, 2006
    #6
  7. wavy

    SnoMan Guest


    Actually is is a problem for plan metal parts because the alchol in
    E85 will react with them the same as water would basically hence the
    need for plastic, proper rubber or stainless steel fuel lines.
     
    SnoMan, Aug 2, 2006
    #7
  8. wavy

    Bret Ludwig Guest

    None of the racing cars running methanol used stainless fuel lines,
    and I don't think E85 factory cars do either. Actually stainless steel
    is a poor choice for fuel lines for reasons known to anyone with P&W or
    GE jet engine experience.

    I wouldn't worry about ethanol too much in terms of materials
    compatibility on modern cars. Methanol is a different issue.
     
    Bret Ludwig, Aug 3, 2006
    #8
  9. wavy

    SnoMan Guest


    Big differenc between a racing car that sees litle usage and lot of
    overhauls and a daily driver. It will corroed plain steel lines with
    time. Just look at the metal fuel lines on a E85 car and you will see
    because Detriot would not waste money on SS fuel lines if it was not
    needed.
     
    SnoMan, Aug 3, 2006
    #9
  10. wavy

    wavy Guest

    After looking over the following data, I've concluded that E85 EXISTS
    only so that the current bureaucratic slimeballs of stupidity can claim
    that "They are doing SOMETHING..." (when the current unsustainable
    situation is just fine with congress and the PREZ & the big oil
    connections)
    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/byfuel/FFV2000.shtml

    Your vehicle would burn SO much more E85 than straight gasoline, that
    you'd save money by spending $3 per gallon of gasoline than spending
    $2.50 per gallon for E85!
    Lets suppose your car gets 25mpg driving to work and back every day.
    At $3 per gallon, that's 12 cents per mile.
    Your 25mpg car MIGHT get something like 20mpg on E85. At $2.50 per
    gallon, that's 12.5 cents per mile.
    So 10,000 miles later you'll have spent $1200 on gasoline or $1250 on
    E85. You havent saved SQUAT.
    (and the 20mpg on E85 in a car that otherwise would get 25mpg on
    gasoline - that might be with a tailwind mostly going downhill)

    For E85 to be cost effective, it would have about 2/3 (or less) of the
    price of gasoline.
    -WaV
     
    wavy, Aug 3, 2006
    #10
  11. wavy

    Steve Guest

    There is no doubt much truth in that statement. But none of that would
    matter if there were a clamor from consumers for an alternative, so I blame
    us consumers more than I blame the politicians. :) <g>
     
    Steve, Aug 3, 2006
    #11
  12. You have found out the truth. I expect people in dark suits wearing
    dark sunglasses will be arriving soon. They might referrer to you as
    "Mr. Anderson", but they really want you. Should have taken the blue
    pill.

    Face the truth. Recycling plastic bottles causes higher oil/energy
    costs and more air pollution, since it takes a lot of energy to reduce
    them back to raw material. Yet we do it.

    Using products made from recycled plastics, verses virgin plastics,
    costs more. To environment, to the manufacturer, and to the consumer.
    Yet we do it.

    Knowledge, education, and understanding is not the fuel for change.
    Personal feelings, and being indoctrinated into the system, makes for
    change. Special interest groups run this country, and like the
    Soviets of the 90's - < 10% of the people impose their will on 100% of
    us.

    Expect E85 imposed as an option, and expect the yearly costs for using
    gasoline to be adjusted up( via taxes, regulation, etc) to force E85
    to be the cheaper fuel.

    Wow, I've turned very cynical in my old age. ;)

    imho,

    tom
     
    Tom The Great, Aug 5, 2006
    #12
  13. wavy

    Ned Guest

    WaVy, check out http://flextek.com/index.htm
    they sell a conversion for most fuel injected vehicles
    its a bit pricey, but I am going to try it .
    just need to figure out how to unplug my injectors to
    match the plugs with their kit [this is my first fi car].
    it also comes with fuel system conditioner and oil
    treatment to get your engine ready for E85.

    Ned
    1996 sl2, 5sp
     
    Ned, Aug 11, 2006
    #13
  14. wavy

    Ned Guest

    OOp's, missed that you had already found the flextek site.
    The flextek people say you only lose 2 or 3 mpg, but the
    real issue as you said is cost effectiveness. There seems
    like there will be a break in price in the next 2 years.
    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/02/06/8367959/index.htm

    this is a good article and not the only one I have read that
    talks about new cellulosic ethanol plants being built and the
    price of ethanol dropping.

    I for one like the idea of my fuel money staying in the Americas.

    Also if you have a good supply of E85 handy, I have 2 stations localy,
    you could modify your engine to take advantage of E85's 105 octane.
    Running 10:1 compression should bring your mpg back up.
     
    Ned, Aug 11, 2006
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.